Home
Latest
Pakistan
World
Politics
Diplomacy
Defence
Sports
Health

Search articles

Loading content…

Asghar Ali Mubarak (AAM News) is an independent Pakistani bilingual digital news platform providing factual and timely news in English and Urdu across Pakistan, politics, sports, economy, diplomacy, defence, health, education, science and technology, and other public affairs.

News

Pakistan
World
Politics
Diplomacy
Defence
Sports
Health
Science & Technology
Opinion
Latest News
All Categories

About & Contact

About AAM News
Contact Us
Editorial Policy
Privacy Policy
Terms of Use
Cookie Policy
YouTube Videos

Developed By

Website developed by Zulqarnain Basher at YFC Solution.

Digital products, websites and software solutions

politics News — Page 192 | AAM News

Section

politics

Latest reporting and analysis in politics.

3,324 stories

News

Postponement of SAARC Summit, Pakistan deplores India’s decision not attending the 19th SAARC Summit Islamabad scheduled from 9th-10th November 2016, Report by; Asghar Ali Mubarak

Postponement of SAARC Summit, Pakistan deplores India’s decision not attending the 19th SAARC Summit Islamabad scheduled…

1 Oct 2016

News

One Indian soldier Chandu Babulal Chohan, captures in clashes with Pakistani forces 16 Indian soldiers were killed in clashes with Pakistani forces at LoC By.Asghar Ali Mubarak Islamabad-At least 16 Indian soldiers were killed, a 22-year-old Indian soldier Chandu Babulal Chohan son of Bashan Chohan from Maharashtra captures by Pakistani forces near Line of Control, sources disclosed while talking to this correspondent from Tutta Pani after India claimed to have carried out surgical strikes in Azad Kashmir .Sources said bodies of Indian soldiers are still lying in the area near Tutta Pani Sector. Pakistan condemns LoC violations by India rejects Indian claim of surgical strikes, Foreign Secretary summons Indian high commissioner; condemns LOC ceasefire violations. The Pakistan Army today captured an Indian army soldier and killed sixteen others in retaliation to India’s firing at the first line of defense at the Line of Control (LoC) at Tatta Pani, sector confirmed security sources. The capture and the casualties sustained occurred when the Indian army opened fire across the working boundary, killing two Pakistani soldiers. “The dead bodies of the Indian soldiers are still to be recovered by the Indian forces as they lay unattended at the LoC. Security sources say the Indian army has yet to recover the bodies for fear of coming under fire from Pakistan,” the sources claimed.The 22-year-old Chandu Babulal Chohan son of Bashan Chohan from Maharashtra captures in clashes with Pakistani forces at along the Line of Control.A Pakistan army statement said “an exchange of fire between Pakistani and Indian LoC troops began at 2:30am and continued till 8:00am in the Bhimber, Hotspring, Kel and Lipa sectors” and added that “Pakistani troops befittingly responded to Indian unprovoked firing on the LoC.” In a TV show Defense analyst Major General (Retd) Ijaz Awan, also confirmed this information. The captured soldier, Chandu Babulal Chohan Father’s name: Bashan Chohan Age: 22-years-old has been shifted to Rawalpindi sources.Earlier Pakistan strongly condemns unprovoked ceasefire violations at LoC by Indian forces, which is a continuation of a pattern of cease fire violations committed by the Indian forces. The valiant Armed Forces of Pakistan have given and will continue to give a befitting response to any aggression. Mean while the Foreign Secretary summoned the Indian High Commissioner this evening (29th September 2016) and rejected the baseless Indian claim regarding the so-called surgical strikes. The Foreign Secretary condemned the unprovoked firing by the Indian Occupation Forces on the LoC, resulting in Shahadat of two Pakistan Armed Forces personnel. These incidents are a continuation of a pattern of ceasefire violations committed by India. He conveyed that the Armed Forces of Pakistan will continue to give a befitting response to any act of aggression. The Foreign Secretary noted that India has deliberately escalated tensions at the LoC in order to divert the attention of the International Community from the grave situation in the Indian Occupied Jammu & Kashmir, where the Indian Occupation Forces have unleashed a reign of terror against innocent and defenseless people.The Foreign Secretary condemned India’s baseless accusation against Pakistan for the Uri attack, within a few hours after the incident. He recalled that it has been a practice in India to blame Pakistan for every such incident but later investigations prove otherwise.The Foreign Secretary stated that Pakistan remains a victim of interference and Indian State sponsored terrorism. In this regard, he referred to the confession statement of serving Indian Naval Officer, KulbushanYadav, who had been carrying out terrorist and subversive activities in Pakistan, especially in Balochistan and Karachi.The Foreign Secretary also expressed Pakistan’s deep disappointment at the decision of India not to participate in the SAARC Summit. For its part, Pakistan is committed to the objective of regional cooperation, envisaged in the SAARC Charter.The Foreign Secretary conveyed Pakistan’s deep concerns over life threats to Pakistan’s High Commissioner in New Delhi and urged the Indian government to ensure the safety and security of Pakistan’s High Commissioner, other officials and their families, in accordance with the Vienna Convention.Pakistan also rejects the baseless Indian claim that it has “carried out surgical strikes into Pakistan”.

News

Pakistan condemns LoC violations by India rejects Indian claim of surgical strikes,Foreign Secretary summons Indian high commissioner; condemns LOC ceasefire violations By.ASGHAR ALI MUBARAK

Pakistan condemns LoC violations by India rejects Indian claim of surgical strikes,Foreign Secretary summons Indian high…

29 Sept 2016

News

Pakistan and India resumed trade on Line of Control, Pakistani traders’ suspended trade to express solidarity with the people of Kashmir and against the civilian killings in the valley after July 9 By. Asghar Ali Mubarak

Pakistan and India resumed trade on Line of Control, Pakistani traders’ suspended trade to express solidarity with the p…

28 Sept 2016

Singer humera arshad’s Child custody case, Judge Muhammad Amin Shahzad, guardian judge VI, Lahore changed Report and Photo by; Azmat Ali LAHORE: The family court Judge Muhammad Amin Shahzad, learned guardian judge VI, Lahore has been changed due to unknown reason. The court earlier has fixed September 30th as the next date to hear the arguments in the case over the custody of singer Humera Arshad and Khalil Ahmad Butt’s son.Both the parents filed complaints in the court against each other for not being able to meet their son. In the reply to Khalil Butt application regarding the custody of minor the mother of minor singer Humera Arshad stated that that the application filed by the applicant Khalil Ahmad Butt is not maintainable in its present form hence liable to be dismissed. That the Khalil Ahmad Butt has concealed material facts from this honorable Court that the applicant very much knows that the minor was illegally in custody of Khalil Ahmad Butt and was handed over to the Humera Arshad on 07-09-2016 by the order of Mr. Ghulam Abbas Sial, learned Additional Sessions Judge Lahore hence the application filed by the applicant is liable to be dismissed.That the he has no cause of action to file the titled application. The application of the applicant is not maintainable or proceed-able under the law.That the applicant Khalil Ahmad Butt has not come to the Court with clean hands.That the minor was handed over to the respondent Humera Arshad on 07-09-2016, thereafter the applicant Khalil Ahmad Butt again filed application for obtaining temporary custody of minor for Eid vacation which was accepted and the minor was handed over to the Khalil Ahmad Butt .It is also pertinent to mention here that minor is studying in School, DHA Lahore. The plea taken by the Khalil Ahmad Butt in this regard has also been countered by the School Administration in which they in their certificate categorically mentioned that “M/s Humera Arshad has been responsible for the stated child’s school tuition which is always paid on time, his books, his school uniform and his pick and drop services to and from his house. For any financial or school matters we have predominantly dealt with M/s Humera Arshad”.Humera submitted that her five-and-a-half-year-old son Ali Muttaqeen Ahmad need to be looked after by his mother at such a young age, while Ahmed Butt complained that Humera was not available at home most of the time to be able to look after the boy. Shooting complaints The first petition was filed on September 2 in the family court by Ahmad Butt. The complaint was filed under Section 7 of the Guardian and Wards Act 1890 for the appointment of a guardian for Ali. In his petition, Ahmed Butt stated that he married Humera on August 8, 2004. However, due to complications in their relationship, they broke off the marriage on June 23. He said their son was a school-going boy, adding Humera was not interested in taking care of Ali. Ahmed Butt alleged Humera to be a habitual drinker and would also smoke in front of their son. He requested the court to let him get Ali’s custody. The court then directed the respondent, Humera, to not snatch the respondent from Ali Butt till the next date of hearing. After that, Humera filed a habeas corpus petition in the district and sessions court, seeking to obtain custody. In her petition, she stated her former husband used to beat her, adding he had also signed an agreement with her on June 23. According to the agreement, she added, their son would first live with her and later she had to hand him over to Ahmed Butt, but the following day, on June 24, he snatched the son. Humera alleged Ahmed Butt to be a drug addict, saying she did not want her son to be looked after by the father. The boy was given to Humera, but Ahmed Butt again filed an application in a family court, seeking the custody. The court asked Humera to hand over the boy to Ahmed Butt for a day under the supervision of the bailiff of the court. After that, Humera requested the court to dismiss Ahmed Butt’s petition filed under the guardians act. To this, Ahmed Butt again filed an application, saying the boy had not attended school since September 7 due to which his future was in jeopardy. He stated he had asked Humera to send the boy to school, but she did not do so. He then again requested for the custody.

News

Singer Humera Arshad’s Child custody case: judge family court Judge Muhammad Amin Shahzad, guardian judge VI, Lahore changed

Singer Humera Arshad’s Child custody case: judge family court Judge Muhammad Amin Shahzad, guardian judge VI, Lahore cha…

24 Sept 2016

News

Pakistani Nation, armed forces ready to defend motherland at every cost: Foreign Office

Pakistani Nation, armed forces ready to defend motherland at every cost: Foreign Office Spokesperson ,Nafees Zakaria con…

22 Sept 2016

News

The Daily Mail Pakistan Presenting Shield to Press Club of India

Originally posted on Asgharalimubarak's Blog: Asghar Ali Mubarak a senior Pakistani Journalist presenting shield from Da…

20 Sept 2016

News

Pakistan’s junior hockey team beat Oman 6-1 in the second Test played at National Hockey Stadium Lahore. Report by Asghar Ali Mubarak

Pakistan’s junior hockey team beat Oman 6-1 in the second Test played at National Hockey Stadium Lahore. Report by Asgha…

18 Sept 2016

News

Prime Minister Pakistan Nawaz Sharif departed for New York to attend the 71st Session of the United Nations General Assembly (UNGA) Report by: Asghar Ali Mubarak

Prime Minister Pakistan Nawaz Sharif departed for New York to attend the 71st Session of the United Nations General Asse…

17 Sept 2016

AAMAsghar Ali Mubarak

News

Oman’s junior hockey team arrived in Lahore– Oman Hockey Association is grateful to the PHF Omani team’s manager Mohammad Abdullah Al-Batrani Report by:Asghar Ali Mubarak

Oman’s junior hockey team arrived in Pakistan Oman Hockey Association is grateful to the PHF for accepting our request “…

16 Sept 2016

News

Oman’s junior hockey team arrived in Lahore– Oman Hockey Association is grateful to the PHF Omani team’s manager Mohammad Abdullah Al-Batrani Report by:Asghar Ali Mubarak

Oman’s junior hockey team arrived in Pakistan Oman Hockey Association is grateful to the PHF for accepting our request “…

16 Sept 2016 · Updated 16 Sept 2016

Page 192 of 277

One Indian soldier Chandu Babulal Chohan, captures in clashes with Pakistani forces 16 Indian soldiers were killed in cl…

29 Sept 2016

News

Singer humera arshad’s Child custody case, Judge Muhammad Amin Shahzad, guardian judge VI, Lahore changed Report and Photo by; Azmat Ali LAHORE: The family court Judge Muhammad Amin Shahzad, learned guardian judge VI, Lahore has been changed due to unknown reason. The court earlier has fixed September 30th as the next date to hear the arguments in the case over the custody of singer Humera Arshad and Khalil Ahmad Butt’s son.Both the parents filed complaints in the court against each other for not being able to meet their son. In the reply to Khalil Butt application regarding the custody of minor the mother of minor singer Humera Arshad stated that that the application filed by the applicant Khalil Ahmad Butt is not maintainable in its present form hence liable to be dismissed. That the Khalil Ahmad Butt has concealed material facts from this honorable Court that the applicant very much knows that the minor was illegally in custody of Khalil Ahmad Butt and was handed over to the Humera Arshad on 07-09-2016 by the order of Mr. Ghulam Abbas Sial, learned Additional Sessions Judge Lahore hence the application filed by the applicant is liable to be dismissed.That the he has no cause of action to file the titled application. The application of the applicant is not maintainable or proceed-able under the law.That the applicant Khalil Ahmad Butt has not come to the Court with clean hands.That the minor was handed over to the respondent Humera Arshad on 07-09-2016, thereafter the applicant Khalil Ahmad Butt again filed application for obtaining temporary custody of minor for Eid vacation which was accepted and the minor was handed over to the Khalil Ahmad Butt .It is also pertinent to mention here that minor is studying in School, DHA Lahore. The plea taken by the Khalil Ahmad Butt in this regard has also been countered by the School Administration in which they in their certificate categorically mentioned that “M/s Humera Arshad has been responsible for the stated child’s school tuition which is always paid on time, his books, his school uniform and his pick and drop services to and from his house. For any financial or school matters we have predominantly dealt with M/s Humera Arshad”.Humera submitted that her five-and-a-half-year-old son Ali Muttaqeen Ahmad need to be looked after by his mother at such a young age, while Ahmed Butt complained that Humera was not available at home most of the time to be able to look after the boy. Shooting complaints The first petition was filed on September 2 in the family court by Ahmad Butt. The complaint was filed under Section 7 of the Guardian and Wards Act 1890 for the appointment of a guardian for Ali. In his petition, Ahmed Butt stated that he married Humera on August 8, 2004. However, due to complications in their relationship, they broke off the marriage on June 23. He said their son was a school-going boy, adding Humera was not interested in taking care of Ali. Ahmed Butt alleged Humera to be a habitual drinker and would also smoke in front of their son. He requested the court to let him get Ali’s custody. The court then directed the respondent, Humera, to not snatch the respondent from Ali Butt till the next date of hearing. After that, Humera filed a habeas corpus petition in the district and sessions court, seeking to obtain custody. In her petition, she stated her former husband used to beat her, adding he had also signed an agreement with her on June 23. According to the agreement, she added, their son would first live with her and later she had to hand him over to Ahmed Butt, but the following day, on June 24, he snatched the son. Humera alleged Ahmed Butt to be a drug addict, saying she did not want her son to be looked after by the father. The boy was given to Humera, but Ahmed Butt again filed an application in a family court, seeking the custody. The court asked Humera to hand over the boy to Ahmed Butt for a day under the supervision of the bailiff of the court. After that, Humera requested the court to dismiss Ahmed Butt’s petition filed under the guardians act. To this, Ahmed Butt again filed an application, saying the boy had not attended school since September 7 due to which his future was in jeopardy. He stated he had asked Humera to send the boy to school, but she did not do so. He then again requested for the custody.

Singer humera arshad’s Child custody case, Judge Muhammad Amin Shahzad, guardian judge VI, Lahore changed Report and Pho…

25 Sept 2016

Latest News

AIOU Notifies Ph.D. Award to Scholar Allama Syed Mohsin Ali Shah
2 Nov 2026
علامہ اقبال اوپن یونیورسٹی نے سکالر محسن علی شاہ کے لیے پی ایچ ڈی ڈگری کے اجراء کا نوٹیفکیشن جاری کر دیا
2 Nov 2026
ہانگ کانگ سکسز 2026 کا ٹائٹل افغانستان کے نام
2 Nov 2026
Pakistan: A Frontline State for Global Peace
1 Nov 2026
پاکستان,عالمی امن کے لیے فرنٹ لائن اسٹیٹ
1 Nov 2026

Editor's Picks

Postponement of SAARC Summit, Pakistan deplores India’s decision not attending the 19th SAARC Summit Islamabad scheduled from 9th-10th November 2016, Report by; Asghar Ali Mubarak
One Indian soldier Chandu Babulal Chohan, captures in clashes with Pakistani forces 16 Indian soldiers were killed in clashes with Pakistani forces at LoC By.Asghar Ali Mubarak Islamabad-At least 16 Indian soldiers were killed, a 22-year-old Indian soldier Chandu Babulal Chohan son of Bashan Chohan from Maharashtra captures by Pakistani forces near Line of Control, sources disclosed while talking to this correspondent from Tutta Pani after India claimed to have carried out surgical strikes in Azad Kashmir .Sources said bodies of Indian soldiers are still lying in the area near Tutta Pani Sector. Pakistan condemns LoC violations by India rejects Indian claim of surgical strikes, Foreign Secretary summons Indian high commissioner; condemns LOC ceasefire violations. The Pakistan Army today captured an Indian army soldier and killed sixteen others in retaliation to India’s firing at the first line of defense at the Line of Control (LoC) at Tatta Pani, sector confirmed security sources. The capture and the casualties sustained occurred when the Indian army opened fire across the working boundary, killing two Pakistani soldiers. “The dead bodies of the Indian soldiers are still to be recovered by the Indian forces as they lay unattended at the LoC. Security sources say the Indian army has yet to recover the bodies for fear of coming under fire from Pakistan,” the sources claimed.The 22-year-old Chandu Babulal Chohan son of Bashan Chohan from Maharashtra captures in clashes with Pakistani forces at along the Line of Control.A Pakistan army statement said “an exchange of fire between Pakistani and Indian LoC troops began at 2:30am and continued till 8:00am in the Bhimber, Hotspring, Kel and Lipa sectors” and added that “Pakistani troops befittingly responded to Indian unprovoked firing on the LoC.” In a TV show Defense analyst Major General (Retd) Ijaz Awan, also confirmed this information. The captured soldier, Chandu Babulal Chohan Father’s name: Bashan Chohan Age: 22-years-old has been shifted to Rawalpindi sources.Earlier Pakistan strongly condemns unprovoked ceasefire violations at LoC by Indian forces, which is a continuation of a pattern of cease fire violations committed by the Indian forces. The valiant Armed Forces of Pakistan have given and will continue to give a befitting response to any aggression. Mean while the Foreign Secretary summoned the Indian High Commissioner this evening (29th September 2016) and rejected the baseless Indian claim regarding the so-called surgical strikes. The Foreign Secretary condemned the unprovoked firing by the Indian Occupation Forces on the LoC, resulting in Shahadat of two Pakistan Armed Forces personnel. These incidents are a continuation of a pattern of ceasefire violations committed by India. He conveyed that the Armed Forces of Pakistan will continue to give a befitting response to any act of aggression. The Foreign Secretary noted that India has deliberately escalated tensions at the LoC in order to divert the attention of the International Community from the grave situation in the Indian Occupied Jammu & Kashmir, where the Indian Occupation Forces have unleashed a reign of terror against innocent and defenseless people.The Foreign Secretary condemned India’s baseless accusation against Pakistan for the Uri attack, within a few hours after the incident. He recalled that it has been a practice in India to blame Pakistan for every such incident but later investigations prove otherwise.The Foreign Secretary stated that Pakistan remains a victim of interference and Indian State sponsored terrorism. In this regard, he referred to the confession statement of serving Indian Naval Officer, KulbushanYadav, who had been carrying out terrorist and subversive activities in Pakistan, especially in Balochistan and Karachi.The Foreign Secretary also expressed Pakistan’s deep disappointment at the decision of India not to participate in the SAARC Summit. For its part, Pakistan is committed to the objective of regional cooperation, envisaged in the SAARC Charter.The Foreign Secretary conveyed Pakistan’s deep concerns over life threats to Pakistan’s High Commissioner in New Delhi and urged the Indian government to ensure the safety and security of Pakistan’s High Commissioner, other officials and their families, in accordance with the Vienna Convention.Pakistan also rejects the baseless Indian claim that it has “carried out surgical strikes into Pakistan”.

About the Author

Asghar Ali Mubarak

Asghar Ali Mubarak is a bilingual journalist covering politics, sports, diplomacy, and current affairs.

About & Contact

Pakistan condemns LoC violations by India rejects Indian claim of surgical strikes,Foreign Secretary summons Indian high commissioner; condemns LOC ceasefire violations By.ASGHAR ALI MUBARAK

Pakistan and India resumed trade on Line of Control, Pakistani traders’ suspended trade to express solidarity with the people of Kashmir and against the civilian killings in the valley after July 9 By. Asghar Ali Mubarak

Singer humera arshad’s Child custody case, Judge Muhammad Amin Shahzad, guardian judge VI, Lahore changed Report and Photo by; Azmat Ali LAHORE: The family court Judge Muhammad Amin Shahzad, learned guardian judge VI, Lahore has been changed due to unknown reason. The court earlier has fixed September 30th as the next date to hear the arguments in the case over the custody of singer Humera Arshad and Khalil Ahmad Butt’s son.Both the parents filed complaints in the court against each other for not being able to meet their son. In the reply to Khalil Butt application regarding the custody of minor the mother of minor singer Humera Arshad stated that that the application filed by the applicant Khalil Ahmad Butt is not maintainable in its present form hence liable to be dismissed. That the Khalil Ahmad Butt has concealed material facts from this honorable Court that the applicant very much knows that the minor was illegally in custody of Khalil Ahmad Butt and was handed over to the Humera Arshad on 07-09-2016 by the order of Mr. Ghulam Abbas Sial, learned Additional Sessions Judge Lahore hence the application filed by the applicant is liable to be dismissed.That the he has no cause of action to file the titled application. The application of the applicant is not maintainable or proceed-able under the law.That the applicant Khalil Ahmad Butt has not come to the Court with clean hands.That the minor was handed over to the respondent Humera Arshad on 07-09-2016, thereafter the applicant Khalil Ahmad Butt again filed application for obtaining temporary custody of minor for Eid vacation which was accepted and the minor was handed over to the Khalil Ahmad Butt .It is also pertinent to mention here that minor is studying in School, DHA Lahore. The plea taken by the Khalil Ahmad Butt in this regard has also been countered by the School Administration in which they in their certificate categorically mentioned that “M/s Humera Arshad has been responsible for the stated child’s school tuition which is always paid on time, his books, his school uniform and his pick and drop services to and from his house. For any financial or school matters we have predominantly dealt with M/s Humera Arshad”.Humera submitted that her five-and-a-half-year-old son Ali Muttaqeen Ahmad need to be looked after by his mother at such a young age, while Ahmed Butt complained that Humera was not available at home most of the time to be able to look after the boy. Shooting complaints The first petition was filed on September 2 in the family court by Ahmad Butt. The complaint was filed under Section 7 of the Guardian and Wards Act 1890 for the appointment of a guardian for Ali. In his petition, Ahmed Butt stated that he married Humera on August 8, 2004. However, due to complications in their relationship, they broke off the marriage on June 23. He said their son was a school-going boy, adding Humera was not interested in taking care of Ali. Ahmed Butt alleged Humera to be a habitual drinker and would also smoke in front of their son. He requested the court to let him get Ali’s custody. The court then directed the respondent, Humera, to not snatch the respondent from Ali Butt till the next date of hearing. After that, Humera filed a habeas corpus petition in the district and sessions court, seeking to obtain custody. In her petition, she stated her former husband used to beat her, adding he had also signed an agreement with her on June 23. According to the agreement, she added, their son would first live with her and later she had to hand him over to Ahmed Butt, but the following day, on June 24, he snatched the son. Humera alleged Ahmed Butt to be a drug addict, saying she did not want her son to be looked after by the father. The boy was given to Humera, but Ahmed Butt again filed an application in a family court, seeking the custody. The court asked Humera to hand over the boy to Ahmed Butt for a day under the supervision of the bailiff of the court. After that, Humera requested the court to dismiss Ahmed Butt’s petition filed under the guardians act. To this, Ahmed Butt again filed an application, saying the boy had not attended school since September 7 due to which his future was in jeopardy. He stated he had asked Humera to send the boy to school, but she did not do so. He then again requested for the custody.